or it could just be that you exaggerated and when it was pointed out to you, you wouldn't accept it so you kept edging out on that limb, pursued by someone who doesn't know how to let go of an argument... there is no way an air filled tyre can rise in pressure 6 times more than a tyre with just nitrogen in it only as a result of heating. the problem you have is that even if we account for you doing something different on each run, the temp change required to cause such a change in pressure is such that your tyres would likely have melted. this is because, for our purposes, pressure approximately varies with temperature.
Look, is there any point continuing this? You're going to keep flogging the ideal gas law. I'm happy if that's the level of your understanding... but if you want to have an open discussion you're going to need to move on and stop basing counter arguements purely on an idealised representation. If you can't do that, then we can't have a discussion.
i'm done here. if you'd like to continue, let's get someone to act as a second and we'll each put up $10. all you have to do to collect is explain, using established physics, how a street legal tyre filled with air can be heated such as to give a pressure change 600% greater than the same tyre filled with n2, initial pressures and change in temperature being equal in both tyres. tell you what, you can even apply twice as much heat to either tyre if you want.
:lol: Sure, i'm happy to wager $10.
I'll start with your 600% greater statement - 2 * 6 is 12, yes. 2 + 12 is 14. That is what equates to 600% GREATER than 2PSI. I think what you were trying to say is that there is a 600% increase... but again... that's not true. To rationally have this argument, you'd have needed to ask a few more questions, including "what was the start tyre pressure". Your claim that there's a 600% increase is incorrect. If you want to start claiming, again, that there's a 600% differential, i'll ask you to go do some math study. 12 - 2 = 10. This is a 5 times differential, not 6. But... putting aside symantics and poor application of math's, we'll move along. Happy with that?
Let's lay out the 'parameters' which you should have been asking for from the beginning:
Vehicle
------------
Peugeot 206GTi180, 1150kg's GVM, FWD
Pirelli PZero Nero's, 205/40R17
Road
---------
Wakefield Park, 2006 (pre resurface)
Air in Tyres, Feb 2006
------------
Ambient Temp = 36deg C.
RH = 56%
Tyre temp = Unknown, too hot to hold my hand on (over 65deg C), did show some signs of serious load/heat related damage (chunks of rubber missing)
Track Surface Temp = Unknown
Target tyre pressure (hot) = 38PSI front and 36 PSI rear
Starting Tyre Pressure (cold); front = 26PSI, rear = 30PSI
Pressure difference = 46.15% for worst case (fronts)
Nitrogen in Tyres, April 2006
-----------------------------
Ambient Temp = 28deg C.
RH = 62%
Tyre temp = Unknown, Cooler than air as i could hold my hand on them
Track Surface Temp = Unknown
Target tyre pressure (hot) = 38PSI front and 36PSI rear
Starting Tyre Pressure (cold); front = 36PSI, rear = 35PSI
Pressure difference = 5.56% for worst case (front)
These are the measurements i took. It's not entirely scientific, so we'll have to agree on some of the other numbers if you want this to go further.
So, do you want to have our wang-off/piss-tols at dawn here in the main forum, or happy to do this via PM so Guy can have his stage back?