How many of these people didn't see this coming is beyond me, they scream bodily autonomy is protected by the 14th yet pushed to force a vaccine across the nation (if you wanted to keep your job, eat, and support your family anyways). By their own standard they did something unconstitutional, as SCOTUS correctly ruled, the vax mandate was an overbearing rule and should have been voted on in congress, not invented by unelected bureaucrats. The vax mandate made law through congress could have still died as it arguably does violate the 14th unless each citizen would have the right to the due process of law before receiving the vaccine.
Of course, RvW failed to address specifically when human life begins, and because abortion is never mentioned specifically as a right under the constitution is was built on swampy grounds. I think one reason the democrats never pushed for a federal abortion law in congress was because they would have had to define when life begins - full stop. They would have had to bring doctors in to explain the biology and arguments would go on for months. The only point in time which irrefutably marks the beginning of a potential human life is when a new human DNA strand is formed very shortly after conception. Of course, this would ban abortion at any stage, killing the bill. The left knows this and chose to ignore it, and instead use the supreme court as a club to bring about results they like regardless of the constitutionality of the thing they want. Of course this why CT claims several other rulings are also bad rulings. AKA, if a right ain't explicitly in the constitution, the federal government doesn't have the power. That power should therefore be kicked to the states. If the constitution does explicitly state a right, like the right to free speech and to bear arms, the states don't have such power to limit such rights.
Gay marriage? I'd argue the constitution provides no provisions in regards to marriage, so it should also be kicked back to the states. Shoot, I'd like the states and federal government to get completely out of marriage all together and instead bring about a universal civil union. Want to marry a rock? Go for it. This however would require an amendment to the constitution, which would be very hard to do. Anything rights related requires a constitutional amendment to solidify those rights, otherwise the government will change the rules when the winds of politics change and such rules are not yet widely excepted. Going back to 2010 or so I was fine with gay marriage being made legal across the country, but was cautiously optimistic the left wouldn't push it any further....holy shit was I wrong. Suffice it to say, my views have changed as I'm seeing half nude drag queens accept cash from children.