cb1111
Newbie
- Location
- Virginia, USA
Jay and Jim just provide great commentary.That checks out
View attachment 226043
Early treatment works best, duh.Here's an interesting article that discusses various treatments and timing of those treatments.
Yes. Fake numbers are easy to publish.
You realize your non expert opinions on this topic are just that right? The real experts are still arguing about all of this and it's going to take more time for definitive answers to be learned.Info on J&J just came out about J&J in a 2 dose regimen is just as about as effective as the mRna vaccines. That said, the info on the spike protein from mRna's being dangerous is a bunch of bull, but, regardless, if you're okay with the J&J, then they're recommending taking it in a 2 dose regimen.
And some people have nothing intelligent to say so they keep typing.Some people write for brevity while others simply write less because they have nothing intelligent to say.
What would you like to argue about?It's Janssen not Johnson
Who's Jim going to argue with all night long?
Number of posts and length of post are irrelevant. Check the reaction score.That checks out
View attachment 226043
I'm asking you to cite one specific article... not every single Nature.com you may have posted in the last... uhmmm, 3659 friggin pages in this thread. If you're not willing to cite it, then I think you've already answered the question - it simply ain't worth citing in the first place.Are you not understand that I've already sent you the links in question? I'm not wasting my time resending the same links again.
Says the guy that keeps typing....And some people have nothing intelligent to say so they keep typing.
I'm asking you to cite one specific article... not every single Nature.com you may have posted in the last... uhmmm, 3659 friggin pages in this thread. If you're not willing to cite it, then I think you've already answered the question - it simply ain't worth citing in the first place.