I support the standards we have in place for government accredited information systems. I am aware of the guy's personal bias, and comfortable knowing if something is discovered it will be audited again and again until we're satisfied with all persons conducting the assessment. I have little to no concern about him lying to the entire US, well knowing his work will be scrutinized to the highest standard.
It gets old hearing emotional responses like "wow you sure do support a conspiracy theorist", when I am correcting incorrect statements such as like "This company has no experience auditing", when their credentials are quite literally based around just that. It's a gross moving of goal-post for the entire conversation, and personally disingenuous, emotional thinking.
Are you going to tell me which companies have experience with election audits at this scale, or which certifications are necessary to perform an election audit? As a business, how would you select someone to perform an audit that has never been done before? It's okay if you don't know the answers to any of these questions, just say I don't know and stop setting impossible standards.