He was 17yo breaking the city curfew, law one. He was breaking the civil disturbance curfew, law two. Ergo, he was breaking multiple laws. The fact others were as well is irrelevant. Your feelings on the subject, evidenced by your “boo hoo,” is irrelevant. The fact remains he broke multiple laws mandating he not be there in the first place.
Now, which law did I cite that isn’t true?
You seem to be resorting to insult and assumption to make your argument. From the nature of your past postings, I figured you to be above such antics. Now you grasp for the racist straw man to prove some point. Remind me, what point are you trying to make here?
Rittenhouse shouldn’t have been there in the first place, those pesky curfews again. Black shouldn’t have purchased a rifle for Rittenhouse, as both have affirmed on the stand. Black shouldn’t have put the rifle in Rittenhouse’s hands that night. These facts leave both Rittenhouse and Black open to civil liability notwithstanding dismissal and/or acquittal of criminal charges. Personally I hope they are found civilly liable and get cleaned out for all they will ever be worth.