cb1111
Newbie
- Location
- Virginia, USA
Unimportant - the facts don't match his fiction, so he has to pick and choose little numbers.Did you know you don't understand statistic?
Unimportant - the facts don't match his fiction, so he has to pick and choose little numbers.Did you know you don't understand statistic?
Did you know you don't understand statistic?
I was going to mention that there's a big difference between a 2% reduction and a 2 percentage point reduction, but didn't think it was worth it.Unimportant - the facts don't match his fiction, so he has to pick and choose little numbers.
From the article and not the summary.Zricky, is that you? Perhaps you didn't actually read the article, but just cherry-picked a couple of numbers without context. From your link:
View attachment 216899
From the article and not the summary.
During March 1–December 31, 2020, state-issued mask mandates applied in 2,313 (73.6%) of the 3,142 U.S. counties. Mask mandates were associated with a 0.5 percentage point decrease (p = 0.02) in daily COVID-19 case growth rates 1–20 days after implementation and decreases of 1.1, 1.5, 1.7, and 1.8 percentage points 21–40, 41–60, 61–80, and 81–100 days, respectively, after implementation (p<0.01 for all) (Table 1) (Figure). Mask mandates were associated with a 0.7 percentage point decrease (p = 0.03) in daily COVID-19 death growth rates 1–20 days after implementation and decreases of 1.0, 1.4, 1.6, and 1.9 percentage points 21–40, 41–60, 61–80, and 81–100 days, respectively, after implementation (p<0.01 for all). Daily case and death growth rates before implementation of mask mandates were not statistically different from the reference period.
Looks like the Comet's interior is in amazing shape just from the little you can see.Comet Update: For a out of his garage mechanic this guy is better than most shops at updates. He's called and asked good questions and I've had text/picture updates.
Mud
you do understand their main demographic that they're dumbing it down for, right?That article even has a picture so you don't need to read for more than 3 seconds to find the conclusion.
View attachment 216909
I mean...maybe the up and down arrows are too ambiguous
you do understand their main demographic that they're dumbing it down for, right?
hint: it's not rednecks in Texas that are checking the CDC's website
Ok, I guess the brain damaged don't understand. Thanks for confirming.I'm not sure which you're advocating for in this example.
Biden is a victim of elder abuse. He should be in a care home.
But do you really?All information is propaganda, I get it.
Wow, the CDC. The same people who lied about outdoor spread by a factor of 10 to make everyone look sick.That article even has a picture so you don't need to read for more than 3 seconds to find the conclusion.
View attachment 216909
I mean...maybe the up and down arrows are too ambiguous