Smallpox vaccinations predate late 18th century Britain.
I was referring to a concerted effort, not isolated instances. In any case the so called covid vax is a sham.
@golfdave they are suppressing the vaccinated deaths data...the 'latest release' stops at September 24. If you look at that graph, you can see the trend begins favoring the unvaccinated. Vaccinated deaths on the rise.
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopula...thsoccurringbetween2januaryand24september2021
View attachment 231113
Ha, you suspect wrong! Well, J&J has been the least effective of the 3 US vaccines, but with a mRNA booster, the J&J efficacy at COVID prevention may be in the 90 percentile. The vaccines have been found to be over 2.5x more effective than natural immunity, alone (according to CDC data).I suspect no more effective than a working immune system.
First we're going to have to get a real vaccine for Covid before it can be eradicated. The antibodies that the current shots produce don't last and aren't very effective obviously with so many people getting Covid who had the shots.I know, in a previous post I had mentioned the treatments in China circa 1500, just that what the British Doctor Edward Jenner did in 1796 is an important milestone in the treatment of smallpox...
As for the concerted effort of mass vaccination, & "only in the 20th century" as per one of your previous posts....I had already answered this, as I state in that post of mine that you quote:- "Or if you want to take the 20th century modern vaccinations only then you are looking at Leslie Collier's (UK again) vaccine from the 1940-1950's which became the standard form of the vaccine adapted by the WHO when the WHO initiated its global smallpox eradication campaign around 1967.
So from 1967 to 1978 is 11yrs ...& we're only a couple of years into Covid....got a few more years to do!!"
As I stated in another previous post the WHO declared smallpox as eradicated in 1980, with the last cases being in 1977/78
Link please.Ha, you suspect wrong! Well, J&J has been the least effective of the 3 US vaccines, but with a mRNA booster, the J&J efficacy at COVID prevention may be in the 90 percentile. The vaccines have been found to be over 2.5x more effective than natural immunity, alone (according to CDC data).
Link please.
Against which variant? Context matters.J&J has shown lower effectiveness compared with the mRNA vaccines, said Dr. Fryhofer. However, a company study from Janssen, its manufacturer, found that two doses given two months apart increased vaccine effectiveness from 70% to 94%. The Food and Drug Administration has yet to verify this data.Nov 1, 2021
https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/public-health/covid-19-vaccine-boosters-mix-and-match-what-evidence-shows#:~:text=J&J has shown lower effectiveness,yet to verify this data.
Let's think for a second... Delta has been the dominant variant in 99% of cases before boosters were even available for Pfizer or Moderna, let alone J&J. So, clearly, the infections being prevented after a J&J booster would not be a Variant A... it would clearly be protecting against the Delta variant.Against which variant? Context matters.
Edit: Checked myself but the variation in efficacy reported has me question the results. Is it x or y, being between x and y leads me to conclude.they really don't know the true impact.
I again go back to, how do we know how that individual would have responded to the illness with and without the vaccine? We won't ever know that answer so I take these statements with a grain of salt.
https://www.healthline.com/health-news/heres-how-well-covid-19-vaccines-work-against-the-delta-variant
- Coronavirus infections caused by the Delta variant, which has surged since July, now make up more than 99 percent of all new coronavirus infections in the United States.
- There’s been an increase in hospitalizations in recent months. The majority involve unvaccinated people.
- Although vaccine effectiveness has waned slightly against infection with Delta, data so far suggests the Moderna vaccine is approximately 50 to 95 percent effective against Delta, and the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is 39 to 96 percent effective against Delta.
- Even though vaccines offer different ranges of protection, real-world evaluations show they still provide robust protection against hospitalization at 60 to 95 percent
When you don't like the truth, you use terms like "regurgitated." The funny thing is that I just skimmed the info, and didn't read that part... the part about it clearly being effective against COVID Delta. I following the news on COVID closely, and haven known since the beginning of 2021 that the experts were all saying that COVID is significantly more contagious than variant A. They predicted that Delta would be 99% + of all cases within just a few weeks.You must have read the link as it states what you just regurgitated.
I know, in a previous post I had mentioned the treatments in China circa 1500, just that what the British Doctor Edward Jenner did in 1796 is an important milestone in the treatment of smallpox...
As for the concerted effort of mass vaccination, & "only in the 20th century" as per one of your previous posts....I had already answered this, as I state in that post of mine that you quote:- "Or if you want to take the 20th century modern vaccinations only then you are looking at Leslie Collier's (UK again) vaccine from the 1940-1950's which became the standard form of the vaccine adapted by the WHO when the WHO initiated its global smallpox eradication campaign around 1967.
So from 1967 to 1978 is 11yrs ...& we're only a couple of years into Covid....got a few more years to do!!"
As I stated in another previous post the WHO declared smallpox as eradicated in 1980, with the last cases being in 1977/78