not sarcasm - discrimination against people with disabilities is a thing, and why we have laws in this country that seek to prevent and correct such things. you seem to not have known what i meant by ableism, i'd guess.
it was demonstrated through legal process that the claims were unsubstantiated.
compromise idea - Gov't issued voter IDs for all currently registered voters, paid for entirely by the government.
They're using Trump as an example of why they shouldn't kick Trump off social media?
The courts not looking at the evidence and not hearing the case is not 'going through the legal process.'
Those cost money. Charging people to have an ID for their constitutional right is a poll tax. stand down, Jim Crow.
I'm not saying we shouldn't help those with disabilities, I'm saying we shouldn't cater to gender or skin color solely based on those 2 things.
That is an absolute horseshit statement. Try any of the white owned (or better yet, white Jewish) owned business is places like Harlem in the 60's and 70's.
Non driver ID is cheap. Besides, welfare people get money. I see them at the grocery store buying cigarettes and lobster. They have ID.
leveling the playing field for disenfranchised groups is not exactly catering.
what evidence do you speak of that was not presented or examined by the legal system?
