the crap so-called premium fuel here in the USA which is 93 RON
Research Octane Number (RON)
The most common type of octane rating worldwide is the Research Octane Number (RON). RON is determined by running the fuel in a test engine with a variable compression ratio under controlled conditions, and comparing the results with those for mixtures of iso-octane and n-heptane.
Motor Octane Number (MON)
There is another type of octane rating, called Motor Octane Number (MON), or the aviation lean octane rating, which is a better measure of how the fuel behaves when under load as it is done at 900 rpm instead of the 600 rpm of the RON[2][3]. MON testing uses a similar test engine to that used in RON testing, but with a preheated fuel mixture, a higher engine speed, and variable ignition timing to further stress the fuel's knock resistance. Depending on the composition of the fuel, the MON of a modern gasoline will be about 8 to 10 points lower than the RON. Normally, fuel specifications require both a minimum RON and a minimum MON.[citation needed]
Anti-Knock Index (AKI)
In most countries, including all of those of Europe, and Australia, the "headline" octane rating shown on the pump is the RON - but in the United States, Canada, and some other countries, the headline number is the average of the RON and the MON, called the Anti-Knock Index (AKI). It may also sometimes be called the Road Octane Number (RdON), Pump Octane Number (PON), or (R+M)/2.
Difference between RON and AKI
Because of the 8 to 10 point difference noted above, the octane rating shown in the United States is 4 to 5 points lower than the rating shown elsewhere in the world for the same fuel.
and now i also understand a little bit more abt these chip things and tbh the 'better' fuel economy while going faster certainly sparks my interest a little
gotta be careful with how you word that. Better fuel economy yes so long as you dont go faster. If you drive on full boost you will use more fuel.
Well, this might be a dumb question but are the fuel cut issues a thing of the past? Any APR owners out there care to dispel my fears regarding this in the year 2009?
funkychilli said:i like this new, helpful forum we've got here without all the bashing and insults. keep up the good work guys!
No problems with Stage 1 cars or most stage 2 cars since early-mid 07 when VW did their recall and changed software to increase the fuel pressure as fuel cuts were a problem even on stock cars, not just remapped cars. Now it sShouldn't be a problem unless you're really pushing high end stage 2 (CAI and TBE should be fine though) or have parts on the way out.
No problems with Stage 1 cars or most stage 2 cars since early-mid 07 when VW did their recall and changed software to increase the fuel pressure
Golf
Model Year 2006 - 2007
Campaign 24K6 - Engine control unit update
On vehicles with 2.0l TFSI engines of the affected chassis number ranges an assumed control unit fault is calculated because of a wrong algorithm in the engine control unit. The engine warning light indicates a fault although there is no defect in the engine control unit.
For safety reasons a check of your vehicle is necessary. The update of the control unit will take less than an hour. Check and update are, of course, free of charge to you.
Golf 2.0 TFSI or 4.2 FSI
Model Year 2006 - 2007
Campaign 24M5 - Low pressure fuel pressure sender
On Golf vehicles with 2.0l TFSI or 4.2l FSI engine of a limited production period the low pressure fuel pressure sender can fail. The failure is indicated by the engine warning light.
The check and repair are, of course, free of charge to you.