I think perception has a lot to do with whether or not people believe their dsg is working perfectly or not and their relative understanding of how this transmission works. I'm just over 30,000 miles and I have had my share of ups and downs with the tranny, mostly when I was flashed with stage 1 Revo. I'm looking forward to the dsg service at 40K (just not the price tag) but overall I'd say the pros heavily outweigh the cons of this transmission, at least for me. Right now I'm on the revo 2+ file and I still feel that revo needs to do a better job of calibrating their software to dsg's.
I posted the other thread and I just wanted to clarify. I am going based on the many posts here that claim their mechatronics needed replacement and some from people I know. It seems to be only a certain range that I have been hearing about (which is late 2008 and 2009s).
Perhaps rampant was a bit strong of a word, but I wasn't exactly happy that the car was going to be out of commission for a month.
Also, one of the things that may have made it worse is I had no basis for comparison. I thought the rough shifts and surging was indicative of the type of transmission. When I drove my friend's TT I was completely surprised at how smooth it was at every RPM range and in every gear change. So if someone didn't know any better (and nothing outright failed or threw a CEL) they could drive for some time without it being obviously broken. I know I did : - (.
In any case I don't want to give the impression that I am against the DSG or VWs or whatever. As I said in the other thread, I love the car and I just want it to work properly.