Sorry for the potentially dumb question... So the Mk7 already comes with a bigger turbo? So that's the main reason for the larger stock HP?
The turbo is a little bigger. The turbine wheel is still the size of the k03 as in the mk6, but unlike the mk6 which has a slightly larger-than-k03 compressor wheel the mk7 has an even bigger compressor wheel. Every time they make improvements to the turbine process efficiency they can modify the compressor wheel a little bit and achieve more flow. It also has variable valve timing on the intake and exhaust cams (mk6 is just intake), and has a modified head.
Stock HP is all marketing. They want to position the car well in their field in terms of hp, tq and mpg. The strategy is to over-design the engine then tune the ECU to marketing specifications.
Everyones freaking out over the numbers from the mk7 but are losing sight of the fact that the new mk7 is gonna run you mid 35k..plus the price of the tune, plus the price of the intake which is nearly another grand. We're talking 36k mk7 vs a mk6 gti you can scoop up for 24k new.
im unsubscribing from this thread, everyones getting so scared its funny. new car depreciation alone on a new mk7 would be more than what paying for a k04 upgrade on an mk6 would be. checks and balances people...at least the car still looks like an mk6...could be worse like when it went from mk4 to mk5 styling.
It's never going to be a "good deal" to upgrade to the mk7 for power. I mean the mk6 k04 is still faster (bench racer alert), and even at ~$2500 you don't have to deal with the price gap between the mk6 and mk7, the dealer price hike for new models and the depreciation. You're looking at paying upwards of $10k to upgrade to this mk7 stage 1 platform, before depreciation.
Of course, you're getting a new car, so it's not like all that $$ is going to power mods. Reliability, cleanliness, handling and technology are also better. Still, being a hobbyist of the greatest depreciating products is difficult.