That graph ignores various other symptoms and lasting damage of COVID-19. Just like the rest of your "evidence", it's cherry-picked. You don't need experts to do math, you DO need experts to interpret data.The graph for coronavirus is exactly the same as a normal flu year. The numbers have fallen off a cliff. I don't need 'experts' to tell me it's over.
This is the peer review LOLYou're not even sending us peer-reviewed memes, much less peer-reviewed research papers.
Sending you raw numbers is like sending a deaf person a CD filled with the most wonderful music in the world.I ACKNOWLEDGE NOTHING BUT STATISTICS!!
No he said she said, send me the raw numbers.
GTIfan99 is a far, far left piece of shit, always has to belittle people that don't support his views. It's best just to ignore his dumbass and put him on your ignore list.
I wasn't 'qualifed' to rebuild my engine after timing failure, but I drive the car everyday???Sending you raw numbers is like sending a deaf person a CD filled with the most wonderful music in the world.
You are not qualified to interpret this raw data.
The graph for coronavirus is exactly the same as a normal flu year. The numbers have fallen off a cliff. I don't need 'experts' to tell me it's over.
Of course you were, you dabbled in shadetree mechanics and you've been into cars for a while, yeah? Cars are a big part of your life and you've hunted for information about them daily for years, yeah? You were more than qualified to learn how to rebuild that engine as you went along.I wasn't 'qualifed' to rebuild my engine after timing failure, but I drive the car everyday???
Remember, peer-reviewed. I'll wait.Wager accepted!!