H&R review
1.2. Black Stock R32 with Haldex Gen II controller:
Given the poor standard of roadway, the OEM suspended R32 was actually the best riding vehicle on this section of roadway. The less rigid anti-roll bars give the suspension more freedom to move around on rough roadways, ensuring the wheels depress far enough into single wheel troughs, rather than be suspended in mid air as the case with the stiffer H&R anti-roll bars on the UG H&R R32. The OEM Black Haldex R32 was fun in that it moved around a lot more than the UG H&R R32, being adjustable on the throttle, with that well known sure footedness that is part and parcel of the OEM R32 machine. It goes to show, when the going gets tough, VW chassis engineers really do know their stuff.
Comparing the Haldex Gen II against the R32 with H&R SPC coilover and H&R anti-roll bars; the addition of the H&R sway bars makes a more notable change in chassis dynamics from understeer biased to neutral. The advantage of the Haldex Gen II is that it does limit understeer when powering on, without reducing the quality of the ride, but it cannot overcome the inherent understeer bias of the OEM anti-roll bars, or the higher ride height at the front of the car relative to the rear, which also induces understeer tendencies. The effect of the Haldex Gen II becomes more conspicuous on the uphill runs of this treacherous route; but failed to ultimately provide the amount of improvement that the anti-roll bars offer. Should this route be wet or greasy, the outcome would be quite different, with the Haldex offering faster transition to rear wheel drive, and the softer anti-roll bars placing less burden on the tyres, allowing the chassis to sway and take some slack before losing grip. The OEM R32 with Haldex Gen II would be the preferred choice in inclement weather & roadways conditions. Unfortunately, it was a fine 25 degree sunny day. Advantage to H&R.
The stock R32 helped to prove that for this section of the terribly bad roadway, you would want only the H&R SPC coilovers, but not the anti-roll bars. The OEM dampers are slightly under damped with both less compression and rebound, and do not offer the feel of the H&R SPC coilover, or Koni FSD; but OEM dampers did manage to hold their own on the rough undulating roadway of route one. Pitch fore and aft is immediately noticeable compared to the other two vehicles. Ask a little more of this Black OEM R32 and it will respond with foolproof understeer, safe for majority of lay motorists, but taking that last bit of bling factor out of a spirited drive with repeated stabs at the steering wheel, especially in low speed corners. Bump steer was also more apparent when striking depressions mid corner, causing a slight loss of feeling and control. Bottoming out the suspension only results in a muted thud, very similar to the H&R coilover, perhaps slightly better. This vehicle also failed to match the sharpness of the UG H&R R32, or mid corner grip levels. But the time the Black Haldex R32 was finished with its initial corner entry body roll, the UG H&R R32 was well and truly into the corner, attacking the exit. The advantages of the Black R32 was at the one wheel bumps and the wavy undulations, which worked to its advantage.
1.3. White Koni FSD/Eibach Prokit/H&R GTI:
This little white GTI running the tried and tested Koni-FSD/Eibach ProKit/H&R offered a quality of ride that was in between the UG H&R R32 and the Black OEM Haldex R32. If only the Koni-FSD and Eibach ProKit progressive rate springs were installed, it would easily offer the best ride, with little loss in handling to the slightly firmer and sportier UG H&R R32. The addition of the H&R sway bars relegated the White GTI to second position in ride stakes. It rated about equal to the UG H&R SPC for handling. While the UG H&R R32 was the firmest in handling with a sharper edge, with higher damper compression and spring rate, the White Koni FSD GTI maintained better composure over the wavy undulations of route one. As a rule of thumb, composure means speed out in real world conditions, as pot holes, bumps, undulations do not unsettle the vehicle, as would be the case of a firmer race car style setup that is likely to become skittish, skipping wheels over and not into bumps in the roadway.
The White GTI has to its advantage a higher threshold of grip level. This is due to the GTI being 200kg lighter than the R32. While both R32 felt more planted when things become demanding, the extra weight works against the R32 in mid corner speed, causing it to loss grip earlier. On the other hand, the GTI was upset to a greater degree over undulations, due to less mass keeping everything down. The VW GTI did exhibit a tad more body roll than the UG H&R R32, but less than the OEM R32. If anything, the on route one, the GTI felt closer to the Black OEM R32 than the stiffer UG H&R R32. The reason being that the Koni FSD is working overtime. Once the Koni FSD valve opens, the damper on the White GTI metamorphosis’s from the slightly softer Koni-Sport into a Koni Red, which gives you that trademark Koni ride. After a run in the White GTI, Jig commented, “The suspension on this rough road is like silky smooth; much smoother than mine (UG H&R R32)”. That’s the trademark Koni ride in a nutshell.
Of course, you lose a bit in feel from the UG H&R R32 and pitch fore and aft was more prevalent. Jig also commented that he noticed an absence of torque steer and felt the chassis balance to be similarly neutral as that of his UG H&R R32. Throttle adjustability was less than the stock Black R32, but more than the UG H&R R32, making the GTI moderate fun when steering on the gas. The refinement was a little behind the other two, but not drastically so, which was surprising. The great virtue of this machine is the Koni FSD adjust to roadway conditions and your driving style, all in an instant, which offers the most convenience.