View Full Version : how often does timing belt need to be changed?
DTMDoc
03-12-2006, 10:11 PM
i am new to the vw world. i am considering buying
a gti, but im curious as to how many miles do you
need to change the timing belt on it?
any ideas?
TIA
KaynE
03-18-2006, 04:36 AM
I think in California it's about every 50k miles and every other state is like 70k?
Horizon
03-18-2006, 07:34 AM
So the GTI has a belt now, instead of a chain? Well that stinks...
GTI2007
03-18-2006, 09:33 AM
So the GTI has a belt now, instead of a chain? Well that stinks...
They use a toothed utherane belt which makes them far superior to the older belts
Dubdr
03-18-2006, 03:51 PM
Recommend 50k as far as I know.
Dubdr
03-20-2006, 12:10 AM
I can tell you for sure next week. As I said, I will pass along all the "top secret" VW info. HAHA
NorthGTI
03-20-2006, 07:02 AM
So the GTI has a belt now, instead of a chain? Well that stinks...
Only the VR6 version of the GTI had a chain before.
Horizon
03-20-2006, 10:49 PM
Goes to show what I know.:tongue: Thanks again for the info guys.
loccusst
03-21-2006, 02:00 AM
I would rather have the belt than the chain.
ukdub
03-21-2006, 01:17 PM
In the UK user manual it says:
check at 60k then every 20k
change at 120k
at 160k replace toothed belt tensioning roller
120k seems alot on a belt. I will not be leaving it that long, thats for sure.
That is miles by the way.
DTMDoc
03-21-2006, 08:51 PM
Thank you for everyone's answer. How much roughly does it cost to change?
Wild Hare
03-21-2006, 11:15 PM
Tensioner and belt should always be changed all at once. That's what VW/Audi recommends.
loccusst
03-22-2006, 02:23 AM
Yeah, I would change it way before the recommended time.
the_saint
03-22-2006, 09:23 AM
Tensioner and belt should always be changed all at once. That's what VW/Audi recommends.
As well as the waterpump I'm sure.
If you're going to have it all apart might as well replace the waterpump too.
Back in 1990 I had a Mits Eclipse/Laser turbo. The recommended belt change interval was 60k miles. Failures were happening and that sweet turbo engine was an "interference" design engine, so if the belt snapped there was valve to piston contact, which could result in extensive repair depending on engine speed and when it snapped.
The Audi 1.8t is also an interference design, so breaking a timing belt is bad news, and a slipped belt could cause problems as well.
A "non interference" design has a small gap maintained between the piston and valves so all one needs is a new belt and retiming and you're off.
Is the 2.0T an "interference" engine, or non?
The 1.8t was so maybe the 2.0T is as well.
Also, it's been 16 years since that Mits belt design and I'm sure modern materials have allowed manufacturers to create lighter and stronger belts than before. So, a belt may sound like a good idea as it may be tough, but it costs in rotational weight and tooth wear.
T
vBulletin® v3.8.0, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.